6021196/2024 and 6021197/2024
K Dorman v Reed Talent Solutions Ltd and London Fire Commissioner
- Decision date
- 17 Aug 2026
- Published
- 9 Sep 2026
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK ↗
Public Interest Disclosure and Unfair Dismissal
Judgment · 14 pages · 99 indexed sections
View PDF ↗
OFFICIAL Case Numbers: 6021196/2024 6021197/2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Karl Dorman Respondent: Reed Talent Solutions Limited (1) London Fire Commissioner (2) Heard at: London South (by video) On: 18 June 2026 Before: Employment Judge N Wilson Appearances For the claimant: Mr Dorman (in person) For the first respondent: Ms A Fadipe (counsel) For the second respondent: Ms A Ahmad (counsel)
JUDGMENT
1. The following complaints were not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. The claims set out below in this paragraph are therefore dismissed as the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear them: a. Automatic unfair dismissal: i. s. 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 (protected disclosures). b. Detriment short of dismissal: i. s.47 B ERA 1996 (protected di...
2. The following complaint is dismissed because the claimant does not have the required length of service to bring the complaint and the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear them: a. Ordinary unfair dismissal (s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996). Page 1of 14
94 more sections not shown.