2303339/2024

Mr A Ahimbisibwe v Strada Care Ltd

Decision date
13 Mar 2025
Published
7 Apr 2025
Country
England and Wales
Source
GOV.UK ↗
Working Time Regulations

Judgment · 20 pages · 35 indexed sections

View PDF ↗
Case Number. 2303339/2024
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Ahimbisibwe Respondent: Strada Care Limited Heard at: London South Employment Tribunal (by video by CVP) On: 26-27 February 2025 Before: Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen Representation: Mr Ahimbisibwe, in person Ms S Wood, Solicitor for the Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Pursuant to regulation 21(c)(i) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the Claimant’s work activities involved the need for continuity of service in relation to residential institutions and therefore the right to daily rest under regulation 10 Working Time Regulations did not apply to the Claimant. The Claimant’s claim alleging breach of regulation 10 is not well founded and is dismissed.
2. The Claimant’s claim that the Respondent failed to allow him to take an equivalent period of compensatory rest as he was entitled to under regulation 24 Working Time Regulations 1998 is not well founded and is dismissed.

30 more sections not shown.