2209032/2022 and 2203208/2023

Mr H Vyas v Atos International Services Ltd

Decision date
8 Jul 2024
Published
24 Jul 2024
Country
England and Wales
Source
GOV.UK ↗
Disability Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Victimisation Discrimination

Judgment · 46 pages · 179 indexed sections

View PDF ↗
Case Numbers: 2209032/2022 & 2203208/2023
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr H Vyas Respondent: Atos International Services Ltd Heard at: London Central On: 26, 27 June, 1, 2, 3 July 2024 (in person) (3 July 2024 in chambers) Before: Employment Judge B Smith (sitting with members) Tribunal member Z Darmas Tribunal Member T Harrington-Roberts Representation Claimant: Mr A Sendall (Counsel) Respondent: Mr T Cordrey (Counsel)
JUDGMENT The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is as follows:
1. The following complaints of direct disability discrimination were not presented within the applicable time limit. It is not just and equitable to extend the time limit: (i) That Mr Tilbury failed to organise a promotion panel for the claimant from 10 February 2021 onwards (a previous manager, Mr Ingleby having agreed to do so) because of his cardiac condition and/or Type II diabetes; and (ii...
2. The complaint of direct disability discrimination about the claimant’s dismissal on 2 February 2023 is not well-founded and is dismissed.

174 more sections not shown.