2303033/2018
Mr D Cox v Adecco Group UK and Ireland and others
- Decision date
- 15 Jan 2025
- Published
- 23 Aug 2019
- Country
- England and Wales
- Source
- GOV.UK ↗
Breach of Contract
Public Interest Disclosure
Unfair Dismissal
Working Time Regulations
Judgment · 44 pages · 309 indexed sections
View PDF ↗
Case No: 2303033/2018
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Daniel Cox Respondent: (1) Adecco UK ltd (2) Giant Professional Ltd (3) London Borough of Croydon Heard at: London South On: 28, 29 and 30 October 2024 and 1, 2, 5-10 November 2024 Before: Employment Judge Rice-Birchall Ms Jerram Mr Singh Representation Claimant: In person R1: Ms Van Den Beck, counsel R2: Mr Green, counsel R3: Mr Partridge, counsel
JUDGMENT The complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure is not well-founded and is dismissed. The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is not well- founded and is dismissed. The complaint in respect of holiday pay is not well-founded and is dismissed.
REASONS Background
1. This is a claim brought by the claimant on 14 August 2018 against three respondents. There have been numerous preliminary hearings, and some case management decisions have been the subject of reconsiderations and/or appeals to the EAT. Amendment application 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017 Case No: 2303033/2018
304 more sections not shown.