4103447/2023
Mrs L Mackenzie v G.O.L.D. Healthcare Solutions Ltd
- Decision date
- 14 Mar 2024
- Published
- 18 Dec 2024
- Country
- Scotland
- Source
- GOV.UK ↗
Disability Discrimination
Judgment · 17 pages · 52 indexed sections
View PDF ↗
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 4103447/2023 (V) Heid at Aberdeen on 26 & 27 February and 4 March 2024 Employment Judge: J M Hendry 10 Members: Mr R Dearie Mrs D Massie Mrs Lisa Mackenzie Claimant 15 In Person, 20 G.O.L.D. Healthcare Solutions Limited Respondent Represented by, Ms L Beedie, Solicitor 25 30
JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The claims for disability discrimination, in particular, the making of reasonable 35 adjustments, not being well founded are dismissed.
REASONS
1. The claimant in her ET1 contended that she was disabled. She had a 40 combination of conditions principally that she was Peri-Menopausal (with
E.T. Z4 (WR) S/4103447/2023 Page 2 certain difficulties arising from that) and ADHD. The respondent company accepted that the claimant had ADHD but did not accept the other conditions amounted to a disability. 5 2. The case proceeded to a case management hearing before Judge O’Donnell on 11 September 2023. Judge O’Donnell sought Better and Further Particulars of the claimant’s conditions.
47 more sections not shown.